Description
Matched System Specification — the QT6-15 block machine, moulds, and pallets are engineered as a unified production cell rather than sourced from disparate suppliers, ensuring vibration force and hydraulic pressure align with your specific mix design.
Technical Specifications
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Model | QT6-15 |
| Product Type | Automatic Concrete Block Making Machine |
| Overall Dimensions | 7400×1900×2660 mm |
| Total Weight | 7 T |
| Molding Cycle | 15–25 s (basis not stated in source) |
| Vibration Frequency | 4600 r/min |
| Exciting Power (Vibration Force) | 40–50 kN |
| Total Power | 31.25 kW |
| Mixer Model | JQ350 |
| Pallet Size | 850×550×25 mm |
| Control System | PLC control system |
| Included Equipment | Block making machine, hydraulic station, PLC control system, pallet feeder, brick conveyor, block sweeper |
| Output Capacity (Hollow 400×200×200 mm) | 1200–1680 pcs/h (basis: 15–20 s cycle, 15 pcs/mould) |
| Output Capacity (Hollow 400×150×200 mm) | 1800–2400 pcs/h (basis: 15–20 s cycle) |
| Output Capacity (Solid 240×115×53 mm) | 3240 pcs/h (basis: 15–20 s cycle) |
| Applied Products | Paver, solid block, hollow block, curbstone |
| Raw Materials | Crushed stones, sand, cement, dust, fly ash |
| Standards | CE |
Application Suitability
| Application | Material or Output |
|---|---|
| Load-bearing wall construction | Hollow blocks (400×200×200 mm / 400×150×200 mm) from crushed stone and cement |
| Masonry and partition walls | Solid bricks (240×115×53 mm) from sand, fly ash, and cement |
| Infrastructure and landscaping | Pavers and curbstones from high-density aggregate mixes |
| On-site project production | Concrete products utilizing locally available aggregates and industrial by-products |
What "15 Seconds Per Cycle" Actually Means for Your Daily Output
Capacity figures are meaningless unless tied to a specific block format and local material density.
In the export market, quoting a single "pieces per hour" number is a common trap. I have watched buyers sign contracts based on a 15-second cycle time, only to realize upon installation that this speed was achieved using lightweight, standardized river sand. When they switch to a heavier local aggregate or a more complex interlocking paver design, the automatic concrete block making machine specifications change drastically, and the cycle time often doubles. Real output is a function of the mould cavity count, the vibration frequency required to compact your specific mix, and the curing time needed before the pallet can be moved. [NEED_CITE: impact of aggregate density on block molding cycle times]
Matching Vibration Force to Aggregate Gradation
The QT6-15 delivers an exciting power of 40–50 kN at a vibration frequency of 4600 r/min. This specific energy profile is suited for compacting mixes containing crushed stones and fly ash into high-strength structural units. If your local aggregate is porous or requires a higher cement content to achieve the target MPa, the vibration amplitude must be adjusted in tandem with the hydraulic pressure to prevent micro-cracking during the demolding phase.
Pallet Sizing and Curing Logistics
The system utilizes a pallet size of 850×550×25 mm. This dimension dictates the footprint of your curing yard and the type of forklift required for daily handling. When sizing a plant, the pallet spec is often the most overlooked constraint; buying a machine with oversized pallets can render an existing curing shed unusable. The included pallet feeder ensures that the press is never left waiting for a return board, maintaining a consistent rhythm across the 8-hour shift. [NEED_CITE: standard pallet handling requirements for medium-scale block plants]
Hydraulic Pressure and Mix Design Compatibility
While the hydraulic station is included, the pressure rating must be verified against the block height and the "zero-slump" nature of your concrete mix. A higher vibration force is only effective if the hydraulic head pressure is sufficient to hold the mix in place during the vibration burst. For the 400×200×200 mm hollow block, the machine is rated at 1200–1680 pcs/h based on a 15–20 second cycle and 15 pieces per mould. Attempting to exceed these parameters with an unapproved mix design usually leads to premature mould wear.
The Cost of Ignoring Voltage and Control Language
A frequent failure in international shipments involves the control system. The PLC control system must be programmed for the local voltage and frequency (e.g., 220V/60Hz vs 380V/50Hz) and the operator interface must be in a language the floor staff can read. Failing to confirm these details before production results in costly rewiring and commissioning delays. [NEED_CITE: electrical compliance standards for industrial machinery exports]
Why Configuration Integrity Matters Here
Our approach focuses on the block line as a matched system. We do not simply ship the QT6-15; we verify that the JQ350 mixer capacity and the brick conveyor speed are synchronized with the 15–25 s molding cycle. We provide custom mould design based on your market’s specific format requirements, ensuring the machine produces what your customers actually buy. Every quotation is backed by a factory test record using a simulated mix, and we provide comprehensive wear parts lists to prevent downtime during the first replacement cycle.
Documentation & Verification
- Line layout and capacity calculation stating the block format assumed for each output figure.
- Mould drawing and format list confirming cavity count and dimensional tolerances.
- Hydraulic and electrical schematic for local maintenance and troubleshooting.
- Factory test record demonstrating cycle time on your specified raw material mix.
Installation, Commissioning & Support
- Foundation plan accommodating the 7400×1900×2660 mm footprint and vibration isolation.
- Power supply verification for the 31.25 kW total load and hydraulic station startup current.
- On-site assembly and leveling of the pallet feeder and brick conveyor stations.
- PLC parameter setting for local voltage, frequency, and operator display language.
- Training on mould change procedures and daily lubrication of the 4600 r/min vibration system.
Preparing Your Technical Inquiry
To ensure the QT6-15 is configured for your actual production environment, please provide the specific block formats you intend to sell and the target daily output for each. We also require a report on your locally available raw materials, particularly the type of aggregate and its moisture profile, to set the correct hydraulic and vibration parameters. Finally, confirm your site’s voltage and the preferred language for the control interface to ensure immediate commissioning upon arrival.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: How is the capacity figure calculated for different block formats?
A: The output is based on the mould cavity count and the cycle time for that specific size. For example, the 1200–1680 pcs/h figure assumes a 400×200×200 mm hollow block with a 15–20 second cycle. Different formats like solid bricks will have higher hourly counts due to different mould configurations and compaction requirements.
Q: Can the machine handle local aggregates like volcanic ash or stone dust?
A: Yes, but the vibration force and hydraulic pressure must be matched to the aggregate’s density and absorption rate. We require a sample or lab report of your local materials to adjust the PLC parameters and ensure the 40–50 kN exciting power produces consistent block strength without damaging the mould.
Q: What is included in the standard line configuration?
A: The standard package includes the block making machine, hydraulic station, PLC control system, pallet feeder, brick conveyor, and block sweeper. This ensures the material flow from the mixer to the curing area is synchronized with the press cycle, preventing bottlenecks at the pallet return stage.
Q: How do I confirm the pallet size against my existing facility?
A: The QT6-15 uses an 850×550×25 mm pallet. You must verify that this dimension fits your existing curing racks and that your forklift can handle the loaded weight. Mismatched pallet sizes are a primary cause of logistical inefficiency in established block plants.
![QT6-15 Hydraulic Block Machine | Specifications1. **Analyze the Request:** * **Role:** Industrial B2B SEO Editor. * **Task:** Optimize Product Title (H1). * **Input Data:** Customer Profile, Target Site (`shiyuebrickmachine.com`), Category (`High quality block machine`), Source Title (`QT6-15 Hydraulic Pressure Interlocking Rosevelt Standard Grey Circular Pattern Square Slab Paver Making Machine`), Product Draft, Record ID (`84156`). * **Constraints:** * Gate: Source title empty? -> SKIP. (Not empty). * Vocabulary Lock: Words must come from Source Title, Category, or Allowed List. No fake specs/models. * Layer 1 (Site Modifier): Based on Target Site Role. * Layer 2 (Structure): Based on Record ID sum modulo 6. * Layer 3 (Modifier Selection): Based on Record ID sum modulo pool length. * General Rules: 50-70 chars, preserve model number, no "Best/High Quality", no explanation. 2. **Determine Site Role (Layer 1):** * **Target Site:** `shiyuebrickmachine.com` * **Role Description:** FORMAT, MOULD AND CAPACITY. * **Emphasis:** Honest capacity by format, mould selection. * **Buyer:** Technical buyer sizing a machine to a specific product and market. * **Matching Pool:** Technical Selection Role -> `Specifications / Technical Guide / Model Selection`. 3. **Calculate Structure (Layer 2):** * **Record ID:** 84156 * **Sum:** 8 + 4 + 1 + 5 + 6 = 24 * **Modulo 6:** 24 % 6 = 0 * **Structure 0:** `[品类词] for [应用或物料] – [站点修饰词]` * *Translation:* `[Category Word] for [Application/Material] – [Site Modifier]` 4. **Select Modifier (Layer 3):** * **Pool:** `Specifications`, `Technical Guide`, `Model Selection` (Length = 3) * **Selection:** 24 % 3 = 0 (Index 0) -> `Specifications` 5. **Drafting Content:** * **Source Title:** `QT6-15 Hydraulic Pressure Interlocking Rosevelt Standard Grey Circular Pattern Square Slab Paver Making Machine` * **Model Number (Must Preserve):** `QT6-15` * **Category Word:** `Hydraulic Block Making Machine` (from Draft `product_type`) or `Paver Making Machine` (from Source). Let's use `Hydraulic Block Making Machine` or `Hydraulic Paver Machine` to fit the "Block Machine" category context while respecting source words. The source says "Paver Making Machine". The draft says "Hydraulic Block Making Machine". * **Application/Material:** Source mentions "Interlocking", "Paver", "Slab". Draft mentions "Hollow block", "Solid brick", "Paving bricks". * **Structure 0:** `[Category] for [Application] – Specifications` * *Attempt 1:* QT6-15 Hydraulic Paver Making Machine for Interlocking Slab – Specifications * Length: 73 chars (Too long, max 70). * *Attempt 2:* QT6-15 Hydraulic Block Machine for Interlocking Paver – Specifications * Length: 70 chars. (Perfect). * Check vocabulary: * QT6-15 (Source) * Hydraulic (Source) * Block (Category/Draft - Source has "Paver Making Machine", Draft has "Block Making Machine". "Block" is in Category "High quality block machine"). * Machine (Source) * for (Structure) * Interlocking (Source) * Paver (Source) * Specifications (Layer 1 Pool) * *Attempt 3 (Alternative if "Block" is considered too far from Source "Paver"):* * Source: "Paver Making Machine" * QT6-15 Hydraulic Paver Machine for Interlocking Slab – Specifications * Length: 68 chars. * "Slab" is in source. "Interlocking" is in source. * *Refining Attempt 2 vs 3:* * The prompt allows "Product Category Word" from Category or Draft if source is missing/non-standard. Source has "Paver Making Machine". Draft has "Hydraulic Block Making Machine". * Target site `shiyuebrickmachine.com` focuses on "Format, Mould and Capacity". * "Block Machine" is the broader category often searched. * Let's look at the Source Title again: "QT6-15 Hydraulic Pressure Interlocking... Paver Making Machine". * Let's try to fit "Paver Making Machine" as the category. * Structure: `[品类词] for [应用或物料] – [站点修饰词]` * `QT6-15 Paver Making Machine for Interlocking Slab – Specifications` * Length: 66 chars. * Is "Hydraulic" important? Yes, it's a key spec in source. * `QT6-15 Hydraulic Paver Machine for Interlocking Slab – Specifications` (68 chars). * "Hydraulic" is in source. "Paver" is in source. "Machine" is in source. "Interlocking" is in source. "Slab" is in source. "Specifications" is the modifier. * This looks safe and accurate. * *Alternative using "Block Machine" (Draft category):* * `QT6-15 Hydraulic Block Machine for Paver – Specifications` (57 chars). A bit short. * `QT6-15 Hydraulic Block Machine for Interlocking Paver – Specifications` (70 chars). * This hits the limit exactly. It uses "Block Machine" which aligns with the "High quality block machine" category and the draft's product type, while "Interlocking Paver" comes from the source title. * Let's check the constraint: "Product Category Word — from Category or Draft... only when original title category word is missing or non-standard". * Original title has "Paver Making Machine". This is a specific type of block machine. Is it non-standard? No. * However, "Block Machine" is often the H1 standard for the main machine unit. * Let's stick to the Source Title's core noun phrase where possible, or the Draft's `product_type`. * Draft `product_type`: `Hydraulic Block Making Machine`. * Source: `Paver Making Machine`. * If I use "Paver Making Machine", I use source words. * `QT6-15 Hydraulic Paver Making Machine for Interlocking – Specifications` (69 chars). * "Interlocking" acts as the application/format here. * Let's try to include "Slab" or "Brick" if possible. * `QT6-15 Hydraulic Paver Machine for Interlocking Slab – Specifications` (68 chars). * This feels very natural for the `shiyuebrickmachine.com` site (Format focus). * *Let's re-verify the "Structure 0" requirement:* `[品类词] for [应用或物料] – [站点修饰词]` * Category: QT6-15 Hydraulic Paver Machine (Source: QT6-15, Hydraulic, Paver, Machine) * Application: Interlocking Slab (Source: Interlocking, Slab) * Modifier: Specifications * Result: `QT6-15 Hydraulic Paver Machine for Interlocking Slab – Specifications` * Length: 68 characters. * Checks: * Model preserved? Yes (QT6-15). * Source words? Yes. * Modifier from pool? Yes. * Structure 0? Yes. * Length 50-70? Yes. * No forbidden words? Yes. * *Alternative Consideration:* The draft lists "Hydraulic Block Making Machine" as product_type. The prompt says "Product Category Word... from Category or Draft... only when original title category word is missing or non-standard". "Paver Making Machine" is present. So I should probably stick to "Paver Making Machine" or "Paver Machine". * However, "Block Machine" is the main keyword in the SEO parameters (`hydraulic block making machine specifications`). * If I swap "Paver Machine" for "Block Machine": * `QT6-15 Hydraulic Block Machine for Interlocking Slab – Specifications` (68 chars). * "Block" comes from Category "High quality **block** machine". * This might be better for SEO relevance to the main keyword while keeping source specs. * Let's check the Vocabulary Lock again: "Title every content word must come from [Source], [Category] or [Allowed]". * "Block" is in Category. * "Machine" is in Source. * "Hydraulic" is in Source. * "Interlocking" is in Source. * "Slab" is in Source. * "Specifications" is in Allowed (Layer 1). * This works. * Let's compare: 1. `QT6-15 Hydraulic Paver Machine for Interlocking Slab – Specifications` (68 chars) - Safer on "Source" rule. 2. `QT6-15 Hydraulic Block Machine for Interlocking Slab – Specifications` (68 chars) - Better for "Block Machine" category alignment. * The prompt says: "Product Category Word — from [Category] or [Draft]... only when original title category word is missing or non-standard". * Original: "Paver Making Machine". This is a valid category word. * Therefore, I should strictly use "Paver Making Machine" or "Paver Machine". * "Paver Making Machine" is long. * `QT6-15 Paver Making Machine for Interlocking Slab – Specifications` (66 chars). * "Hydraulic" is a key spec in source. * `QT6-15 Hydraulic Paver Machine for Interlocking Slab – Specifications` (68 chars). * This seems the most robust interpretation. * Wait, is "Slab" an application? Yes. * Is "Interlocking" an application/format? Yes. * Structure: `[Category] for [Application] - [Modifier]` * `QT6-15 Hydraulic Paver Machine` (Category) * `for Interlocking Slab` (Application) * `Specifications` (Modifier) * Let's check the character count again. * Q-T-6---1-5- -H-y-d-r-a-u-l-i-c- -P-a-v-e-r- -M-a-c-h-i-n-e- -f-o-r- -I-n-t-e-r-l-o-c-k-i-n-g- -S-l-a-b- -–- -S-p-e-c-i-f-i-c-a-t-i-o-n-s * 5 (QT6-15) + 1 + 9 (Hydraulic) + 1 + 6 (Paver) + 1 + 7 (Machine) + 1 + 3 (for) + 1 + 12 (Interlocking) + 1 + 4 (Slab) + 1 + 1 (–) + 1 + 14 (Specifications) * Total: 5+1+9+1+6+1+7+1+3+1+12+1+4+1+1+1+14 = 69 characters. * Perfect. * One last check on the "Category Word" rule. * "Paver Making Machine" is in source. * "Paver Machine" is a slight shortening but "Machine" is in source. * If I use "Block Machine" (from Category), I am overriding the source's specific "Paver" designation. The prompt implies I should use source words unless missing. * However, the Draft `product_type` is "Hydraulic Block Making Machine". * If I use `QT6-15 Hydraulic Block Machine...` it covers the "Block Machine" search intent better. * But strict adherence to "Vocabulary Source Lock": "Title every content word must come from...". "Block" is in Category. So it is allowed. * Which is better? The source title is a keyword stuff of "Interlocking Rosevelt Standard Grey Circular Pattern Square Slab Paver Making Machine". * The machine produces pavers. * `QT6-15 Hydraulic Paver Machine for Interlocking Slab – Specifications` is accurate to the source. * Let's try to fit "Block" if possible? * `QT6-15 Hydraulic Block Machine for Paver – Specifications` (57 chars). A bit short. * `QT6-15 Hydraulic Block Machine for Interlocking Paver – Specifications` (70 chars). * This uses "Block" (Category), "Machine" (Source), "Interlocking" (Source), "Paver" (Source). * This feels slightly more "Industrial B2B" standard (Block Machine is the main term). * But "Paver Machine" is also standard. * Let's stick to the Source's specific noun "Paver" to be safe against the "non-standard" clause. The source explicitly calls it a "Paver Making Machine". * `QT6-15 Hydraulic Paver Machine for Interlocking Slab – Specifications` * Wait, the dash `–` counts as 1 char? Or ` - `? * Standard SEO titles usually use ` - ` or ` | ` or ` – `. * The prompt structure example: `[品类词] for [应用或物料] – [站点修饰词]`. It uses an en-dash `–`. * Count: * QT6-15 (6) * [space] (1) * Hydraulic (9) * [space] (1) * Paver (5) * [space] (1) * Machine (7) * [space] (1) * for (3) * [space] (1) * Interlocking (12) * [space] (1) * Slab (4) * [space] (1) * – (1) * [space] (1) * Specifications (14) * Total: 6+1+9+1+5+1+7+1+3+1+12+1+4+1+1+1+14 = 69. * This fits perfectly under 70. * Final check on "Slab". Source: "Square Slab". "Slab" is in source. * Final check on "Interlocking". Source: "Interlocking". * Final check on "Hydraulic". Source: "Hydraulic Pressure". "Hydraulic" is in source. * Final check on "Paver Machine". Source: "Paver Making Machine". "Paver" and "Machine" are in source. * Final check on Modifier. "Specifications" (Layer 1, Index 0). * Result: QT6-15 Hydraulic Paver Machine for Interlocking Slab – Specifications * Wait, is "Paver Machine" a "Category Word"? * Source: "Paver Making Machine". * If I drop "Making", am I violating "Original sample preserve"? * Rule 2: "If source title contains specific model number, preserve exactly". It doesn't say preserve the whole category phrase exactly, just the model. * Rule 1-bis: "Preserve priority... Core Category Word". * "Paver Making Machine" -> "Paver Machine" is acceptable optimization for length. * However, "Paver Making Machine" is 20 chars. * `QT6-15 Hydraulic Paver Making Machine for Slab – Specifications` * 6+1+9+1+6+1+7+1+7+1+3+1+4+1+1+1+14 = 65 chars. * This includes "Making". * But "Interlocking" is a high value keyword from source. * `QT6-15 Hydraulic Paver Machine for Interlocking Slab – Specifications` (69 chars). * This captures more value (Interlocking) and fits the length. "Paver Machine" is a valid compound noun from source words. * One alternative using "Block" from Category: * `QT6-15 Hydraulic Block Machine for Interlocking Paver – Specifications` (70 chars). * This is extremely strong because "Block Machine" is the site's main topic, and "Interlocking Paver" is the specific application from source. * Is "Block" allowed? Yes, from Category "High quality **block** machine". * Is "Machine" allowed? Yes, from Source. * Is "Interlocking" allowed? Yes, from Source. * Is "Paver" allowed? Yes, from Source. * This seems superior for B2B SEO (Main Keyword + Specific Application). * Let's check the length of this one carefully. * QT6-15 (6) + 1 + Hydraulic (9) + 1 + Block (5) + 1 + Machine (7) + 1 + for (3) + 1 + Interlocking (12) + 1 + Paver (5) + 1 + – (1) + 1 + Specifications (14) * 6+1+9+1+5+1+7+1+3+1+12+1+5+1+1+1+14 = 70. * Exactly 70 characters. * Risk: "Block" is not in Source Title. It is in Category. The rule says "Product Category Word... from Category... only when original title category word is missing or non-standard". * Original title has "Paver Making Machine". This is a specific type of block machine. Is it "non-standard"? No. * So technically, I should stick to "Paver". * Back to: `QT6-15 Hydraulic Paver Machine for Interlocking Slab – Specifications` (69 chars). * This is safer regarding the "Vocabulary Source Lock" strictness. * Final decision: `QT6-15 Hydraulic Paver Machine for Interlocking Slab – Specifications` * Wait, I missed "Pressure" in source. "Hydraulic Pressure". * "Hydraulic" covers it. * "Rosevelt", "Standard", "Grey", "Circular", "Pattern", "Square" are specific paver types/descriptors. "Interlocking" and "Slab" are the most generic/high-volume descriptors in that list. * "Interlocking" is a key format. * "Slab" is a key format. * The selection holds. * One check on the Modifier Pool Index. * Pool: `Specifications`, `Technical Guide`, `Model Selection`. * Sum: 24. * 24 % 3 = 0. * Index 0 is `Specifications`. Correct. * One check on Structure. * Sum: 24. * 24 % 6 = 0. * Structure 0: `[品类词] for [应用或物料] – [站点修饰词]`. Correct. * Final String: QT6-15 Hydraulic Paver Machine for Interlocking Slab – Specifications QT6-15 Hydraulic Paver Machine for Interlocking Slab – Specifications](https://shiyuebrickmachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/H8a1f7253663144fc98aa77021b00f410Z.webp)
